I read an article on my ph. today at Salon that basically says Trump in some respects is more Liberal then Hillary. I think the author misses the pt. about the Donald. He might not be a politician, but he is a CON and nothing he says is to be believed. Donald is the kind of person that says and does whatever he feels he needs to do to acquire whatever it is he needs in that moment. It's all about Donald and what Donald wants and anyone that gets in his way is to be dealt with. Give a man like this World power and God only knows how he will abuse it. HRC is no treat either, I got news for you I almost fear her as much as I fear him. My biggest fear is that as a women with power she will be endlessly finding ways to show how tough she is and that's not what we need right now. When I mean tough I mean find wars and conflicts to fight, not that she'll get tough on the banks or Big Pharma. I don't believe she'll do that. Still, she isn't as dangerous as Trump.
Yes, when Susan Sarandon said she fears Clinton's war mongering more than Trump's wall, well the analogy is, of course, deliberately inaccurate and tilted with a weak comparison. She may in fact believe that, but I fear Trump's willingness to talk up nukes, remove millions of people by force, segregate others, essentially tamp down the brown skinned peoples, his overall violent egotistical and yet somewhat juvenile nature, his contempt of women, and on and on. I fear that much more than Clinton's alleged 'war mongering' and incidentally not to defend her, but Clinton did not start the Iraq War, let's be clear, that was Cheney/Bush and the neocons. The way it is being now told, it's as if she started it and somehow is all in on more wars. I don't believe she is, at least any more than Obama. I fully expect the drone wars to continue, and the smaller 'interventions'. She is not going to start a massive land war anywhere. She is not GW Bush and Cheney.
2 comments:
I read an article on my ph. today at Salon that basically says Trump in some respects is more Liberal then Hillary. I think the author misses the pt. about the Donald. He might not be a politician, but he is a CON and nothing he says is to be believed. Donald is the kind of person that says and does whatever he feels he needs to do to acquire whatever it is he needs in that moment. It's all about Donald and what Donald wants and anyone that gets in his way is to be dealt with. Give a man like this World power and God only knows how he will abuse it. HRC is no treat either, I got news for you I almost fear her as much as I fear him. My biggest fear is that as a women with power she will be endlessly finding ways to show how tough she is and that's not what we need right now. When I mean tough I mean find wars and conflicts to fight, not that she'll get tough on the banks or Big Pharma. I don't believe she'll do that. Still, she isn't as dangerous as Trump.
Yes, when Susan Sarandon said she fears Clinton's war mongering more than Trump's wall, well the analogy is, of course, deliberately inaccurate and tilted with a weak comparison. She may in fact believe that, but I fear Trump's willingness to talk up nukes, remove millions of people by force, segregate others, essentially tamp down the brown skinned peoples, his overall violent egotistical and yet somewhat juvenile nature, his contempt of women, and on and on. I fear that much more than Clinton's alleged 'war mongering' and incidentally not to defend her, but Clinton did not start the Iraq War, let's be clear, that was Cheney/Bush and the neocons. The way it is being now told, it's as if she started it and somehow is all in on more wars. I don't believe she is, at least any more than Obama. I fully expect the drone wars to continue, and the smaller 'interventions'. She is not going to start a massive land war anywhere. She is not GW Bush and Cheney.
Post a Comment