Saturday, August 27, 2016

Recap

  On Saturday morning August 27th -

Five Thirty Eight has Clinton with an 81.1% chance of winning the election with 339.7 electoral votes.

The New York Times has Clinton with a 90% chance of winning the election with 347 electoral votes.

The Princeton Election Consortium has Clinton with a 95% chance of winning the election with 340 electoral votes.
Posted by at

4 comments:

Glynn Kalara said...

Yes, for the moment things still look good, but the trend is bad and at the rate she's sinking by Oct. he'll be back in a tie with her. Why is the ?? By Nov. he'll be winning. It's scary.

9:37 AM
Jim Sande said...

I had read from the likes of Nate Silver is that there is an expected tightening of the race with the popular vote, and no doubt he will win some of the swing states. But still, if the numbers were reversed, how would you feel then? I prefer our position even if she drops. Just Thursday Quinnipiac had her 51% to 41% so her numbers look good and I think after this last Trump demolition that she gave in Reno, that she is fighting back the way she should. Have you noticed that no Republicans outside of his weak campaign people, defended him from Clinton's speech on Thursday. That is telling. When they say nothing, it means they agree with her, it's really that simple.

11:57 AM
Glynn Kalara said...

I hope your right. The Clinton's are arrogant and tone deaf. The Foundation thing is pure friggin election poison and if they can't see that God help us. It's a direct conflict of interest and always has been.

12:12 PM
Jim Sande said...

I think back to Cheney and Halliburton and it's rather amazing would you agree. Somehow Cheney/Halliburton/Iraq War was just fine, it was 'All American', patriotic, even helpful. Bullshit, it was fascism and then some.

12:24 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)