Search This Blog

Monday, October 25, 2010

Al Qaeda, Iraq, Wiki Leaks

The Iraq Wiki Leaks are cementing into place all that we had already known about how al Qaeda established itself in Iraq after the war began.

The entire meaning of the war, as a war to fight terrorism, was not true. The people responsible for 9-11 were not in Iraq when the war began. Yet the defenders of this policy could care less.

So here we are almost a decade later, and the machinery of war raged on. The Bush administration and its neocon cronies, loving play golf and gleefully conjure up more body mangling carnage to delight future Republican administrations. That's something you can count on.

Al Jazeera: Files show al-Qaeda's grip on Iraq
"If you're asking, are there al-Qaeda in Iraq, the answer is yes, there are. It's a fact, yes." Donald Rumsfeld, US Secretary of Defence, August 2002


It was one of the key American justifications for the Iraq war. But the theory that al-Qaeda was present in Saddam-era Iraq, much cited by the Bush administration in the run-up to the invasion, has been undermined by the content of secret US military documents.


The files contain only half a dozen references to the group for the whole of 2004, the year records begin. But under the leadership of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a Jordanian who had met Osama bin Laden while fighting the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, the classified reports show that al-Qaeda established itself as major player in the carnage as the conflict wore on.


The infrequency of al-Qaeda-related files early in the war suggest that US officials were wrong when they accused Iraq of harbouring the group's fighters in the years prior to the invasion. Instead, the narrative that emerges from the classified reports indicates that the US presence itself was what attracted them to the country.

No comments: