Search This Blog

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Bush Criticized (What Else Is New)

Is it possible that Bush did "absolutely nothing to follow up" when told that bin Laden was planning to strike in the US because:

a. He and the neocons were in on it.

or

b. He and the neocons saw it as an opportunity to enact their horrible and malicious policies. The neocons even said as much in their salient "Project for a New American Century" document which called for a new American Pearl Harbor.

or

c. Both of the above...

Sande is unwilling to write option "d. "None of the above" because after almost 8 years of searching finds no evidence to support "d."

Yahoo: Bush criticized by former 9/11 commission member
In "The Emperor's New Clothes: Exposing the Truth from Watergate to 9/11," Richard Ben-Veniste writes that CIA analysts told Bush that bin Laden was determined to strike inside the United States, "yet the president had done absolutely nothing to follow up."

2 comments:

Glynn Kalara said...

Terrorism was downgraded from the start in the BV$H admin. It was used later on after 9/11 as a means to end. ( to Invade Iraq and grab the oil Cheney and his oil pals desired. All the rest was just BS. Terrorism was also used to make BV$H a dictator and allow Cheney to run the show behind the scenes. Cheney though still thinks he can run things after the case.

Glynn Kalara said...

Or as Sean hannity and the otrher RT. wing noise boxes all scream day and night. It was ALL Clinton's fault! If he'd not had SEX with that women we'd never been hit.

Remember what most of the rt. wing preachers said after 9/11? It was God's revenge for homosexuals and liberals etc.