Its very simple. Tasini supports the immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq, as do I.
Hillary Clinton supports more of the same in Iraq and I do not support that view.
I was opposed to this war from the outset aware that the neo-conservative "Project for A New American Century" was behind all of the reasonings, rhetoric, and the skewered justifications.
I will be posting on the neo-conservatives. In short they are an extremist radical militant group pushing the notion of endless American War. Their goal is a world dominated by American Corporatism achieved through unparalleled military superiority. They of course see themselves as the rightful heirs to this throne, the new world leaders. These people like war and want more of it. Their first practice war is the present Iraq War. Iraq was a theoretical good first choice in their opinion because it possessed no WMD and was an inconsequential threat to the United States. Nothing in their document expresses any concern about the cost of endless war. They express human life costs as a regrettable consequence. The majority of neo-conservatives have no actual military experience themselves. Amazingly Hillary Clinton chose to side with this cabal.